How to Scale an Accounting Firm Past Solo: The Three Gates
The exact inflection points: when to raise prices, when to systematize, when to hire, and the numbers to check before you make each move.
A solo accounting firm hits a ceiling built from three variables: your hours, the share of them you can bill, and the rate you collect. Scaling past solo means moving those variables in a specific order.
The Dream Firms Three Gates gives you a trigger, a test, and a pass condition at each inflection point. The whole roadmap is free on this page.
- The Ceiling Equation: why more hours and more clients stopped working, shown in one worked table
- Gate One, Price: the 12-month test, the 1-in-5 client test, and the two-price-firm test, plus the 20% math
- Gate Two, Process: the Three Times Rule and the Top Ten Procedures you write before anyone is hired
- Gate Three, People: the 15-hour, 8-week rule and a payback table that tells you whether the first hire funds itself
- The Scale Calendar, the Scale Roadmap stage table, the second ceiling at three to five people, and when not to scale at all
The short answer: you scale an accounting firm past solo by passing three gates in order. Raise prices first, because it adds cash without adding a person, and when some clients leave, it hands hours back as well.
Write the procedures second, because a hire without procedures is a dump, not a delegation. Hire third, once the first two gates have shown you exactly what the hire will do and how it will be paid for.
Price. Process. People.
In that order, with a number to check at each gate. The rest of this page is the how, and the when.
Now the scene that brings most owners to this page.
You are turning down work. Or you are taking it and paying for it with your weekends. Your calendar is full from January to April and half full the rest of the year, which somehow still feels like full.
You have read the advice: “hire someone,” “build systems,” “work on the business, not in it.”
None of it tells you which one comes first, what has to be true before you do it, or how you will know the moment has arrived instead of guessing and hoping.
That is the gap this page fills. Not fifteen strategies. Three gates, in order, each with the signal that says you are standing at it and the test that says you are ready to pass.
This page owns the sequence and the inflection points: which lever to pull first and how to know it is time. For the hire itself, who to bring on first and how to find and train them, use your accounting firm’s first hire.
For the price conversation, the letter, and the pushbacks, use how to raise prices on accounting clients, and for the windows in the accounting year when a raise lands best, when to raise prices at your accounting firm. This page tells you the order and the moment.
Those pages carry the scripts.
The Solo Ceiling: Why Working Harder Stopped Working
Every solo firm’s revenue is the product of three numbers. Write it down once and the whole scaling problem gets simpler.
Here is what the equation looks like for a solo owner at capacity. The figures are illustrative arithmetic, not a survey. Put your own numbers in the same slots.
| Line | Illustrative solo owner | How it is computed | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hours worked per week, averaged across the year | 50 | Your calendar, honestly | Busy season pushes it past 60; summer pulls it back |
| Working weeks | 48 | 52 minus time off | Four weeks of holidays, sickness, and CPE |
| Total owner hours | 2,400 | 50 × 48 | The one number with a hard stop |
| Share of hours you can bill | 60% | Billable hours ÷ total hours | The other 40% is sales, admin, email, billing, software, and chasing documents |
| Billable hours | 1,440 | 2,400 × 60% | What the firm can actually sell |
| Effective rate actually collected | $150 per hour | Revenue ÷ billable hours | Whatever you quote, this is what you collect |
| Revenue ceiling | $216,000 | 1,440 × $150 | Above this, something has to give |
Look at what the owner in that table can and cannot do.
Add ten hours a week and the ceiling rises to about $259,000, at the cost of every evening. That is the move most owners make first, and it is the only move with a hard stop.
Take on more clients at the same price and nothing changes, because the constraint was never demand. It was hours.
Raise the effective rate from $150 to $180, a 20% increase, and the ceiling rises to $259,200 with the same hours. Lift the billable share from 60% to 70% by handing off the admin, and it rises again to $302,400. Add a second person’s hours, and the first line stops being the ceiling at all.
Here is what owners try first, and what each move actually does to the ceiling.
“I’ll just work more this year.” Moves the one variable with a hard stop. The ceiling rises a little and your health pays for it.
“I’ll take on more clients.” Hits the same ceiling sooner. More clients at the same rate is more hours, and you were already out of hours.
“I’ll hire someone to help.” The right move, at the wrong gate. Without price and process first, the hire is paid from underpriced work and handed tasks nobody wrote down.
That is why the order matters. The three gates are the three variables, taken in the sequence that makes each one pay for the next.
I joined Dream Firms as a last-ditch effort to save my solo accounting firm. Not even a year in, this program has not only saved my business…It is transforming it!
The Dream Firms Three Gates
A gate is an inflection point you pass on purpose, not a phase you drift into. Each of the three has the same four parts.
The Trigger is the signal that says you are standing at the gate. The Test is the number you check before you pass.
The Pass is the move itself. The Trap is what owners do instead, usually because it feels safer.
| Gate | The Trigger | The Test | The Pass, and the Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| One · Price moves the rate | At capacity, and the fees have not moved in twelve months | The 12-month test, the 1-in-5 client test, the two-price-firm test | Pass: a floor increase on legacy clients, packaged fees for new ones, an annual increase written into the engagement. Trap: hiring first, so the new payroll is funded by underpriced work. |
| Two · Process moves the billable share | You have done the same task three times this month with nothing written down | The Three Times Rule and the Top Ten Procedures | Pass: one page per recurring task, then hand the first ten to software or to the person you are about to hire. Trap: buying software to fix a process that does not exist yet. |
| Three · People adds the second line | Price and process are done, and you still have 15 hours a week of work that does not need your license | The 15-hour, 8-week rule and the payback table | Pass: a part-time hire on the documented work, reviewed three cycles in full, then less. Trap: hiring a copy of yourself first, or hiring in February. |
Why price comes before people. A price increase adds cash with no payroll and no training, and when some clients leave over it, it frees hours too. Passed properly, it funds the hire before the hire exists.
Why process comes before people. The first hire is going to do your recurring, non-license work. If that work is not written down, you will spend the first six months answering questions about it, which is the bottleneck you were trying to remove.
Why people comes last. It is the most expensive move, the slowest to reverse, and the one that changes your job description. You want to arrive at it with the money already in the firm and the work already on paper.
Tyler doesn’t just offer generic advice; he provides a clear, actionable roadmap that actually moves the needle. Our systems are tighter, our lead flow is better, and the ROI was apparent almost immediately. If you’re looking to scale, Tyler is your guy.
Gate One: Price
Most solo owners are standing at this gate and do not know it, because underpricing does not feel like a problem. It feels like being busy.
The Trigger
You are at capacity, meaning you are turning work away, delaying it, or absorbing it into your evenings, and your fees have not moved in the past twelve months. That combination is the gate. Capacity without a recent price move means you are rationing your hours by exhaustion instead of by price.
The Tests
The 12-month test. When did each client’s fee last go up? If the honest answer for most of the list is “when they signed,” the rate variable in the Ceiling Equation has been frozen while your costs have not.
The 1-in-5 client test. Go down the client list and mark every client you would not take today at today’s fee. If more than one in five gets a mark, part of your capacity is already spoken for by work you would not choose.
Repricing them is the polite version of firing bad accounting clients, and some will leave on their own.
The two-price-firm test. Are new clients paying more than legacy clients for the same work? In our experience, a solo firm a few years in is often running two price lists without meaning to.
The gap between them is the raise you have already proven the market will pay.
The same benchmark found 28% of firms said fear of losing clients held them back, while 30% reported no hesitation at all. Read those together: the owners who hesitate and the owners who do not are looking at the same clients. The difference is the math they have run.
The Pass
Run the 20% math before you send anything. It is the arithmetic that turns fear into a decision.
| Scenario (illustrative) | Clients | Average fee | Revenue | Owner hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | 60 | $3,600 | $216,000 | 1,440 |
| Raise 20%, nobody leaves | 60 | $4,320 | $259,200 | 1,440 |
| Raise 20%, one in six leaves | 50 | $4,320 | $216,000 | 1,200 |
| Raise 20%, one in four leaves | 45 | $4,320 | $194,400 | 1,080 |
Read the third row twice. Lose one client in six after a 20% raise and revenue is unchanged while 240 hours come back to you. Those 240 hours are the first hire’s training time, or the procedures in Gate Two, or your summer.
Even the fourth row, a loss most owners would call a disaster, leaves you with 360 fewer hours and a client list that has been filtered for people who value the work. In a solo firm at capacity, that is a stronger position than the first row, not a weaker one.
The pass itself has three parts, and each has its own playbook in this library.
A floor increase on legacy clients. The 20% figure is a floor for clients who have not moved in years, not a ceiling. The conversation, the letter, and the three pushbacks are scripted word for word in how to raise prices on accounting clients.
Packaged fees for new clients. Stop quoting hours to anyone new. Package the work so the fee is attached to an outcome, using tiered pricing or the five real service-package examples, and price it on value with the firm-wide value pricing transition.
The complete pricing strategy guide is the hub for all of it.
An annual increase written into the engagement. Passing Gate One once is a raise. Writing the increase into every engagement letter is a system, and it means you never stand at this gate by accident again.
The Trap
Hiring first. The owner at capacity feels the pain as “too much work,” so the instinct is to add a pair of hands. But the new payroll is then funded by the same underpriced work, the owner’s hours barely move because the hire needs training, and eighteen months later the firm has more revenue, more cost, and the same exhausted owner.
Pass Gate One first and the hire arrives with its salary already in the firm.
The information available to us in Tyler’s program and from him directly has transformed the way we think about our tax advisory firm, including how we hire and train people, and how we generate new business. We have been able to raise our prices significantly and change the way that we talk to prospective clients.
Gate Two: Process
Gate Two is the one owners skip, because it produces no revenue on the day you pass it. It produces something better: a firm that can be handed to someone else one task at a time.
The Trigger
You have done the same task three times in the past month, and nothing about it is written down anywhere except in your head. Onboarding a client.
Closing a month. Assembling a return for review.
Chasing documents. Answering the same question twice.
If you disappeared for two weeks, the things that would break are the things that live only in your head. Those are the tasks standing at Gate Two.
The Tests
The Three Times Rule. Any task you have performed three times in a month gets a one-page procedure before the fourth time. Not a manual.
One page: the outcome, the steps, what done looks like, and where the files live. This is the working rule we use with the firms we work with, and it is deliberately low.
The Top Ten Procedures. Before the first hire, the ten most frequent recurring tasks in the firm exist on paper. Ten is the test.
If you cannot name ten recurring tasks, you are not at Gate Three yet. If you can name ten and none are written, you are standing at Gate Two.
The Pass
Write the ten pages. Then look at each one and ask which of three hands it belongs in.
Software’s hands. Document chasing, reminders, scheduling, and invoicing are the first candidates to hand to a tool, and the honest, unsponsored comparison of what those tools actually do is in accounting workflow automation. For the wider question of which parts of the firm a machine can carry, use how to build an AI-powered accounting firm.
The next hire’s hands. Onboarding logistics, return assembly, and the monthly close are the first hire’s job description. You just wrote it.
Your hands. The review checklist and the weekly firm review stay with you. They are the two procedures that let you check everyone else’s work without redoing it.
Your inbox deserves its own mention, because it is the recurring task owners least believe can be handed off. It can, and the 10-minute-a-day email system is the procedure.
This is the standard operating procedure (SOP) before hire rule from our first-hire playbook, seen from the other side. That page tells you to document before you hire. This gate tells you why the sequence matters: the documentation is how you find out what the hire is for.
The Trap
Buying software to fix a process that does not exist. Workflow tools are excellent at running a procedure and useless at inventing one. The owner who buys the tool at Gate Two, before the ten pages, spends three months configuring a system around habits that were never examined and concludes the software did not work.
Write the page. Then pick the tool that runs the page.
Gate Three: People
By the time you reach this gate, two things have changed. The firm has more cash per hour than it did, and ten of its recurring tasks are on paper. That is what makes the hire safe.
The Trigger
Price and process are done, and you are still carrying at least 15 hours a week of work that does not need your license and is already written down. Not “I feel busy.” Fifteen counted hours of documented, non-license work, week after week.
The Tests
The 15-hour, 8-week rule. Track the documented, non-license hours on your calendar for eight consecutive weeks outside busy season. If the average holds at 15 or more, you have a part-time role, and you have its job description already, because it is the Top Ten Procedures.
This is our working rule, not a survey finding. Fifteen hours is the point at which a part-time hire has enough recurring work to become competent rather than idle.
The payback table. Before you post the role, run this arithmetic with your numbers. The wage anchors are federal medians; your market will differ, and the point is the shape of the math, not the exact figures.
| Line (illustrative) | Part-time admin or bookkeeping hire | Arithmetic | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hours per week | 20 | 15 documented hours + 5 | Room to grow into the next rung of work |
| Hourly wage anchor | $24.36 | $50,670 ÷ 2,080 hours | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) median for bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks, May 2025 |
| Annual wage | $23,386 | 20 × 48 weeks × $24.36 | 960 paid hours a year |
| Payroll taxes, software seat, onboarding time | $4,700 | About 20% on top | A planning figure, not a quote |
| Annual cost of the hire | $28,086 | $23,386 + $4,700 | Round to $28,000 for the decision |
| Owner hours freed per year | 720 | 15 × 48 weeks | The documented work, now off your desk |
| Half of those hours re-deployed to billable work | $64,800 | 360 × $180 | At the post-Gate-One rate |
| The other 360 hours | Sales, procedures, rest | 360 × 0 | The work that moves the next gate |
| For comparison: accountant-level hire anchor | $40.23 per hour | $83,680 ÷ 2,080 hours | BLS median for accountants and auditors, May 2025 |
Two things to notice. The hire is funded more than twice over by half the hours it frees, at the rate Gate One produced.
And the $28,000 figure is why price comes first: at the old $150 rate with 60 clients, the same hire would have felt like a risk. After Gate One, the 20% raise alone adds $43,200, which covers the hire and leaves about $15,000 over.
For the accountant-level hire that comes later, the anchor in the last row is roughly two thirds higher per hour, which is why our working recommendation is that the first hire is not a copy of you. Sources: BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks and BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, Accountants and Auditors.
The Pass
Hire part-time onto the documented work, and only the documented work. Who that person should be, admin, bookkeeper, lead-generation specialist, or CPA, is the whole of your accounting firm’s first hire.
That page also covers how to find, vet, and train them so it sticks. The short version, and our working recommendation: the first hire takes the lowest-license, highest-frequency work off your desk, which in the firms we work with is almost always admin or bookkeeping, not a second you.
Review every deliverable in full for the first three cycles. Then review a sample.
Then review only exceptions. That shrinking review is what makes the hire actually free your hours instead of moving them from doing to checking.
The full rung-by-rung handoff method is in the delegation ladder.
The Trap
Two traps, and they are opposites. The first is hiring a copy of yourself, a second CPA, because it feels like the only hire that “really” helps. It is the most expensive hire, it does the work you are best at, and it leaves you with all the admin you were drowning in.
The second is hiring in February. A hire needs three clean cycles of review before you can trust the work, and nobody has fifteen minutes to review a cycle in the middle of busy season. Which brings us to the calendar.
One of the biggest wins for me? Finding my first hire with their step-by-step guidance. That alone has made a huge impact on how I run my business.
The Scale Calendar: When in the Year to Make Each Move
An accounting firm does not have twelve equal months. It has a compression period, a recovery period, and a planning period, and each gate has a window where it lands and a window where it fails.
| Window | What the firm is doing | Which gate | The move |
|---|---|---|---|
| January to mid-April | Compression. Every hour is spoken for. | None. Observe. | Log the tasks that hurt. Note every client you would not take today. Do not send letters, do not hire, do not buy software. |
| Late April to June | Recovery. The list is fresh in your mind. | Gate One: Price | Run the three tests against the list you logged. Send the legacy increase letters with a July or renewal effective date. Package the fees for anyone new. |
| July to August | The quiet months. The only time the firm has slack. | Gate Two: Process | Write the Top Ten Procedures, one a week. Hand the first two or three to software. Decide which pages become the job description. |
| September to November | The fall deadlines: a live rehearsal at a lower volume. | Gate Three: People | Hire part-time onto the documented work. Run three full review cycles before December. The October deadline is the practice run. |
| December | Close-out and planning. | Check the gates | Recount the Ceiling Equation with the new rate, the new billable share, and the second line. Set next year’s gate before January eats it. |
The two mistakes the calendar prevents are the two most common ones we see: a price letter sent in March, when clients are stressed and you have no time for the conversation, and a hire made in January, when there is no time to train.
The detailed timing windows for a price increase, including the deadline-driven ones, are in when to raise prices at your accounting firm. The calendar above is the version that shows where the other two gates fit around them.
If you are reading this in September and you have not passed Gate One, do not skip to the hire because the hiring window is open. Send the price letters now with a January effective date, write the procedures through the fall, and hire after the spring deadline instead of before it. One season late on the right sequence beats one season early on the wrong one.
The Scale Roadmap: Five Stages on One Page
Here is the roadmap as a page you can read right now, not a file you have to wait for. Find your stage in the first column, then the gate you are facing in the third.
| Stage | What it feels like | The gate ahead | The number to watch | The move | The mistake |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 · Solo, at capacity | Turning work away or paying for it with evenings | Gate One | Months since the last fee increase | Run the three price tests, send the floor increase, package new-client fees | Hiring first |
| 1 · Solo, repriced | Fewer clients, same revenue, hours back | Gate Two | Recurring tasks with a one-page procedure (target: ten) | Write the Top Ten, hand two or three to software | Buying the tool before the page |
| 2 · Solo plus support | A part-time person owns the documented admin | Gate Three, passed; review shrinking | Clean review cycles (target: three, then sample) | Full review, then sample, then exception | Redoing the work instead of correcting it |
| 3 · First technical hire | Someone else prepares; you review and advise | Gate One again, at the firm level | Effective rate on team hours versus your own | Package and reprice firm-wide so team hours earn the firm rate | Selling team hours at a discount |
| 4 · Three to five people | Every question routes through you | The second ceiling, see below | Hours you spend reviewing and answering | Authority levels, a reviewer, the gates again | Staying the hub |
The three checklists below are the roadmap in the form you can actually use. Tick the boxes on your phone; nothing is saved and nothing is collected.
You pass this gate when the rate variable is moving on its own and the client list has been filtered by price instead of by exhaustion.
The letters are out and the effective date is set. You do not need every client’s answer to move to Gate Two; you need the decision made and the calendar to hold you to it.
You pass this gate when the ten most frequent tasks in the firm exist on one page each, and at least two of them are already running without you.
The “next hire” pile has at least 15 hours a week of work in it. If it does not, you are not at Gate Three yet, and that is useful to know before you post a job.
You pass this gate when a second person’s hours are on the second line of the Ceiling Equation and your review of their work is shrinking on a schedule.
The freed hours are actually re-deployed, half to billable work and half to the next gate. A hire that frees 15 hours you then spend re-checking their work has not passed anything.
Want the systems behind the gates?
The Three Gates are one system inside a firm that runs on purpose. Start with a free, live CPE credit, taught through CPA Academy, a NASBA-registered sponsor, and learn alongside entrepreneurial accountants building firms that no longer depend on the owner’s evenings.
Get a Free CPE Credit →The Second Ceiling: Three to Five People
Here is the part no scaling article tells you. Scaling past solo happens twice.
The first time, you are the only pair of hands. The second time, somewhere between three and five people, you are the only brain.
Every question routes to you. Every deliverable waits for your review.
The team is idle when you are in a meeting and buried when you come out. The firm has more people and the owner has the same calendar.
In the most recent CPA Firm Top Issues Survey from the AICPA’s Private Companies Practice Section (PCPS), with 629 respondents, tax law complexity ranked first for solo practitioners and for firms with up to 10 employees. For firms with 11 to 30 people, the top issue was hiring experienced staff, and for firms with 31 to 100 it was developing the next generation of firm leaders.
When the same respondents ranked the issues they expect to matter most over the next five years, staff retention made the top five for every firm size except sole practitioners.
Read the sequence. The problem you are solving today is not the problem the next stage will hand you, and the gates are how you meet each one on purpose. Source: Journal of Accountancy, reporting the PCPS CPA Firm Top Issues Survey; the AICPA & CIMA release.
The good news is that the second ceiling is the same three gates, with different content behind each door.
Gate One, again: the firm-level price. At three to five people, the question is no longer “what do I charge” but “what does an hour of the team’s work earn the firm.” The trap at this stage is selling team hours at a discount because “it is not me doing it.”
Package the work so the fee is attached to the outcome, not to whose hands touched it. The firm-wide value pricing transition and tiered pricing are the tools.
Gate Two, again: the review system. The procedures that took the work off your desk now have to take the checking off your desk. That means written authority levels for each person, a review that shrinks from full to sample to exception on an announced schedule, and a reviewer who is not you.
Workflow software earns its keep here, and the unsponsored guide covers what it can and cannot see.
Gate Three, again: the first senior. The hire that breaks the second ceiling is the one who can review, not just prepare. It is the most expensive hire you have made, and it is funded the same way the first one was: by passing Gate One at the firm level first.
You will not see partner-level numbers at five people. You will see the mechanism: the firms that make money are the ones where the owner’s hours stopped being the ceiling, and the rate kept moving.
And if the ceiling feels like your own stamina rather than your structure, start with the burnout structural fix.
What Scaling Does to What Your Firm Is Worth
Every gate you pass changes what a buyer would pay for the firm, and it is worth knowing the direction before you choose your destination.
Gate One raises the value directly. Buyers pay for recurring revenue and margin. A repriced client list with an annual increase written into the engagements is worth more per dollar of revenue than the same list frozen at signing-day fees, because the buyer inherits the increase.
Gate Two makes the firm transferable. A firm whose procedures live on paper can be run by the buyer. A firm whose procedures live in the owner’s head is, to a buyer, a set of relationships that may or may not survive the handover.
Gate Three is the one that changes the category. A firm with a team that prepares, and a review system that does not route through the owner, is a business someone can buy and run. A solo firm, however profitable, is a book of clients attached to a person, and buyers price it that way.
The honest market math, what practices actually trade for and what lands in your pocket after terms, is in how much is an accounting practice worth. The eight things buyers pay a premium for, most of which are Gate Two and Gate Three in different words, are in what makes an accounting firm sellable. And when the time comes, how to sell your accounting firm is the process.
A premium solo can be sold. It sells as a client list with strong fees, usually with the owner staying through a transition, and usually for less than a firm of the same revenue with a team and a review system.
That is not a reason to scale. It is a reason to choose with the number in front of you rather than behind you.
Seven Ways Scaling Past Solo Fails
We have watched a lot of owners attempt this. The failures are remarkably consistent, and every one of them is a gate taken out of order or a test skipped.
-
1
The hire-first scale
Pain arrives as “too much work,” so the owner adds hands before adding price. The new salary is funded by underpriced clients, the owner’s hours barely move during training, and the firm ends up bigger, more expensive, and just as exhausted. Gate Three taken before Gate One.
-
2
The clone hire
The first hire is a second CPA, because it feels like the only hire that “really” helps. It is the most expensive role, it takes the work the owner is best at, and it leaves every hour of admin exactly where it was. Our working recommendation: the first hire takes the lowest-license, highest-frequency work, which in the firms we work with is almost always admin or bookkeeping.
-
3
The dump
A person is hired onto work nobody wrote down. They guess, the guess is wrong, and the owner concludes that hiring does not work.
Hiring did not happen. Gate Three was attempted with Gate Two open behind it.
-
4
The software scale
A tool is bought to fix a process that does not exist. Three months of configuration later, the firm has an expensive system built around habits nobody examined.
Write the page first. Then pick the tool that runs the page.
-
5
Growing the wrong list
The owner treats scaling as “more clients” and fills the freed capacity with the same kind of client that created the ceiling. Run the 1-in-5 test before you fill a single freed hour, and fill it with the clients you would choose. Who to replace them with is half of that decision.
-
6
The busy-season move
A price letter sent in March, or a hire started in January. Neither has room to succeed. The calendar exists because the accounting year is not twelve equal months, and a good move in the wrong window looks like a bad move.
-
7
Staying the hub
The firm reaches four people and every question still routes to the owner. This is the second ceiling, and it is passed the same way the first one was: price at the firm level, a review system that shrinks, and a hire who can check work instead of only producing it.
Frequently Asked Questions
When should a solo accountant hire their first employee?
Should I raise prices before hiring in my accounting firm?
How much revenue does a solo accounting firm need before hiring?
Do I need systems before I hire, or can I build them with the hire?
What is the first hire for a solo accounting firm?
Can I scale an accounting firm without hiring anyone?
How long does it take to scale an accounting firm past solo?
Start With a Free CPE Credit
No card required. Take a live CPE credit through CPA Academy, a NASBA-registered sponsor, and you’re inside the Dream Firms world, where entrepreneurial accountants trade what’s actually working, alongside 100+ firm owners growing on purpose.